DocumentsDate added
The ART study had two treatment arms (cash and food) and aimed at comparing outcomes for clients
initiating an ART regime. These interventions (i.e. cash and food) were designed to improve the
nutritional status of ART Study clients and their families with the intention of increasing adherence to
and effectiveness of ART. The clients were supported unconditionally with monthly food or cash
transfers using electronic vouchers for a period of 8 months in accordance with the WFP Zambia
protocol. WFP standard food basket utilized under this study consisted of a 25kg maize meal, 4kg
beans, 2kg sugar, 2.5litres vegetable oil and 1kg salt. Clients on cash transfer received the amount
which was equivalent to the value of the cost of the food bas
ket.
The overall study aim was to fully understand which transfer mechanism (cash or food) ensures
adequate nutrition improvement for those initiating ART treatment,and increases adherence to Anti-
Retroviral Treatment (ART) in a more effective way. This study specifically the study was intended to
examine whether providing cash or food transfers to patients initiating ART improves their
nutritional status (BMI); assess whether providing cash or food transfers to patients initiating ART
improves Household Diet Diversity Score (HDDS); assess which transfer type (cash or food)
improves adherence to ART; examine whether CD4 count is improved by providing a patient
initiating ART with a food or cash transfer; assess whether the household asset base is increased by
providing cash or food transfers to patients initiating ART; examine whether household income is
improved when patients initiating ART are provided with cash or food transfers;and assess which of
the two transfers (cash or food) is more cost effective.
The study was conducted in Eastern Province of Zambia, in Katete District, at St. Francis Mission
Hospital. This was an intervention study, focusing on HIV positive individuals initiated on ART. The
enrolled adults (both male and female aged 18 to 55 years) were randomly allocated to twotreatment arms (cash or food) using computer-generated random numbers.
A total of 351 clients were enrolled in the study of 175 were on cash and 176 on food transfers atbaseline. However, during data analysis, 13 (3.7%, 8 and 5 on cash and food respectively) were
disqualified on account of them being above the required age of 55 years in this study and thus were
not included in the analysis. Therefore, at baseline only 338 study clients (167 on cash and 171 on
food) were included in the analysis. At post assessment,a total of 293 clients from 338 completedthe whole period of 8 months of intervention indicating an attrition rate of 45 (13.3%) of which 147
and 146 were on cash and food transfers respectively.This attrition is attributable to deaths of 12clients (3.6%) while 33 (9.8%) clients voluntarily dropped out.The study did not formally investigate
the reasons why clients voluntarily dropped out of the study. However, through observations and
interactions with their close associates by the project team, it was noted that relocation, stigma and